the reflex effect?
over on business week’s hot property blog, chris palmeri is talking about what pimco’s paul mccaulley calls the reflex effect. in short, this is emotional, momentum-driven behavior.
Rising prices get more people excited about buying, even though
they’re paying more. Falling prices make people less excited about
doing any transaction. This observation has broader economic
implications. Even if home prices don’t fall, sales could decline,
putting less money in people’s pockets and slowing the economy. That’s
evident in today’s stats from the California Association of Realtors.
Even though the median-priced home in California jumped 16% in November
to $548,400; sales declined 11.2%, to 579,560, from a year ago. “We are
starting to see the ‘soft landing’ we have been expecting,” said the
association’s chief economist Leslie Appleton-Young. And the reflex
effect McCaulley’s talking about.
it seems to me like leslie appleton-young and paul mccaulley can’t both be right. when a tradeable asset reaches an inflection point and starts its price motion in the opposite direction, it very often builds velocity on the way down. and mccaulley is describing, i think, a market that conforms to this type of behavior, i.e. the downturn tends to accelerate on the way down as people look around and see prices falling. so who is right? i guess time will tell.